Brandon Personal Injury Attorney
It's Like Having a Lawyer in the Family
Follow Us Facebook Twitter Linked In

Call For a FREE Consultation Handset 813-438-5960 Serving Brandon, Tampa and all of Florida

A Dog Bit My Child. Will the Insurance Company Automatically Compensate My Family?

Dog5

Every year, dogs bite about 4.5 million Americans. Many of these victims are children between five and nine. Furthermore, in most of these incidents, the attack occurred in a familiar environment, such as a friend’s home.

These attacks cause physical and emotional injuries. Physically, dog bites often cause both deep puncture wounds and severe tearing lacerations. Furthermore, the knockdown alone might cause broken bones and a head injury. Emotionally, children are especially prone to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and other lingering problems.

Because of these issues, a Brandon personal injury attorney might be able to obtain substantial compensation in these cases. But the insurance company is not legally required to pay in all cases.

Strict Liability Claims

Florida has a limited strict liability law. Owners, and therefore homeowners insurance companies, are liable for bite damages as a matter of law. The only recognized defense is contributory negligence, which is outlined below. The assumption of the risk defense usually does not apply. In strict liability claims, the dog’s viciousness, or lack thereof, is irrelevant.

Strict liability claims are relatively easy to prove in court. However, damages are often limited. Owners are only liable for bite injuries. The strict liability law does not cover the aforementioned knockdown injuries. Furthermore, many Hillsborough County jurors do not award large damages in strict liability cases, since the owner was arguably not at fault. Most jurors are pet owners themselves, or they at least know people who are pet owners.

Dog Bites and Negligence

Typically, compensation is a bit higher in negligence claims. However, such claims are harder to prove in court.

First, victim/plaintiffs must prove the owner knew the dog was potentially dangerous. Evidence of knowledge includes things like:

  • Loud barking,
  • Aggressive lunging,
  • Baring of teeth, and
  • Previous attacks.

Those previous attacks could have been against animals or people. However, prior attacks against people is much stronger evidence of knowledge.

Next, victim/plaintiffs must prove the owner was negligent. Essentially, negligence is a lack of care. Allowing a child to play in the same room or yard as a dangerous dog is probably not negligent in this context. Allowing a child to play next to a dangerous dog might be negligent.

The good news is that a little evidence goes a long way. The burden of proof is only a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not).

Assumption of the Risk and Contributory Negligence

Warning signs like “Beware of Dog” make it easier to establish the assumption of the risk defense. This legal doctrine excuses liability if the victim:

  • Voluntarily assumed
  • A known risk.

Most children voluntarily go to a friend’s house. However, even if there was a sign in the yard, the risk might not be a known one. Many children have limited reading and comprehension skills. They either cannot read the sign or cannot understand what it means.

This defense also comes up in other premises liability matters, like falls and swimming pool drownings.

Contributory negligence shifts blame for the bite from the owner to the victim. Generally, dog bite contributory negligence involves provocation. Insurance companies frequently argue that the child provoked the animal.

As a preliminary matter, young children cannot provoke animals as a matter of law. Generally, six is the age cutoff.

Older children might provoke a dog, but legal provocation is not easy to prove. Essentially, “provocation” is synonymous with “torture.” The child must have inflicted so much physical pain on the animal that the animal was compelled to defend itself. Sudden movements and intentional teasing may be unwise, but they are not provocative.

Rely on Experienced Attorneys

Child dog bite victims might be entitled to substantial compensation. For a free consultation with an experienced Brandon personal injury lawyer, contact Reed & Reed, Attorneys at Law. We have four area offices (St. Petersburg, Lakeland, Tampa, and Clearwater).

Resource:

cdc.gov/features/dog-bite-prevention/index.html

https://www.needreed.com/visible-and-invisible-dog-bite-injuries-in-brandon/

Brandon Personal Injury
Reed & Reed, Attorneys at Law, is located in Brandon, FL and serves clients in
and around Brandon, Tampa, Apollo Beach, Sydney, Gibsonton, Balm, Valrico, Wimauma, Sun City Center, Lithia, Ruskin, Durant, and Hillsborough County.

Our Locations

Brandon

101 East Lumsden Road
Brandon, FL 33511
Tel: 813-438-5960
Fax: 813-438-5995

St. Petersburg

1700 66th Street North, Ste. 104-1008
St. Petersburg, FL 33710
Tel: 727-362-7520
Fax: 727-362-7521

Lakeland

248 N Kentucky Avenue #72
Lakeland, FL 33801
Tel: 863-274-7715
Fax: 863-274-7716

Tampa

401 E Jackson Street, Ste. 2340
Tampa, FL 33602
Tel: 813-440-6678
Fax: 813-440-6682

Clearwater

13575 58th Street N, Ste. 200
Clearwater, FL 33760
Tel: 727-767-9914
Fax: 727-767-9915

Memberships

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission from www.NeedReed.com

MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2014 - 2020 Reed & Reed, Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab